Vaclav Petras wrote:

> I think this is exactly what I mean. Any reason for using the variables
> instead of d.mon?

d.mon isn't something you'd want to use from scripts or other
programs. Ultimately, d.mon is just causing those environment
variables to be set whenever you run a display command, so documenting
the variables themselves is more general than documenting a specific
mechanism used to set them. And if you don't need the convenience of
the d.mon interface, setting the variables directly removes some
complexity from the process.

-- 
Glynn Clements <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

Reply via email to