On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Markus Neteler <[email protected]> wrote: > Unless there are other implications, a backport of r65438 would be good.
Right, the change should be save therefore backported in r65439. Have a nice day. Pietro _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
