* Vaclav Petras <[email protected]> [2015-06-25 11:42:45 -0400]: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Nikos Alexandris <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Yep, but a scripter wouldn't want to repeat `grass.script.` everytime. > > Would he? > > > > That's why I think > > import grass.script as gscript > > should be used. The examples were just showing different scenarios and > possible confusion. > > I past I was thinking about it and at the beginning I though that we should > use > > import grass.script.core as gcore > import grass.script.raster as graster > ... > > which is most detailed and allows for an empty __init__.py in script > directory, but after trying it, considering the existing practice, and > state of grass.script package, I decided that > > import grass.script as gscript > > is better.
Makes sense. If someone can come up with something even better, please chime in. Thanks for demonstrating it Vaclav, Nikos _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
