Hi, FYI
maybe interesting for us as well (except for the cmake part) for winGRASS... Markus ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Howard Butler" <[email protected]> Date: Jul 5, 2015 5:22 PM Subject: Re: [Proj] AppVeyor (Windows CI) setup + Windows CMake question To: "PROJ.4 and general Projections Discussions" <[email protected]> Cc: > > > On Jul 4, 2015, at 2:13 PM, Even Rouault <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Similarly to Linux Travis-CI builds, I've also added the configuration for the > > AppVeyor hosted CI service for Windows builds > > :https://github.com/OSGeo/proj.4/blob/master/appveyor.yml > > > > The following configurations are tested (for pushes and pull requests) : > > Environment: BUILD_TYPE=cmake, VS_VERSION=Visual Studio 10; Platform: x64 > > Environment: BUILD_TYPE=cmake, VS_VERSION=Visual Studio 10; Platform: x86 > > Environment: BUILD_TYPE=cmake, VS_VERSION=Visual Studio 11; Platform: x64 > > Environment: BUILD_TYPE=cmake, VS_VERSION=Visual Studio 11; Platform: x86 > > Environment: BUILD_TYPE=cmake, VS_VERSION=Visual Studio 12; Platform: x64 > > Environment: BUILD_TYPE=cmake, VS_VERSION=Visual Studio 12; Platform: x86 > > Environment: BUILD_TYPE=nmake; Platform: x64 > > Environment: BUILD_TYPE=nmake; Platform: x86 > > Thanks! So many warnings! [1]. > > PDAL uses AppVeyor for its windows builds too and we’ve been very happy with it. I paid for the basic account which does make things run quite a bit faster than otherwise would be expected for the OSS variant. Maybe we could convince OSGeo to pay for such infrastructure. > > [1] https://ci.appveyor.com/project/OSGeo/proj-4/build/job/2j2mt8kllv8klqx4 > ... (proj4 cmake stuff deleted) ... _______________________________________________ > Proj mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/proj
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
