On 09/10/15 20:22, Anna Petrášová wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Martin Landa <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi,
2015-10-03 18:10 GMT+02:00 Vaclav Petras <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>:
> +1
>
> Moving code around is good but should not be backported since it has often
> unforeseen consequences (for example the data catalog changes).
agreed. To solve the last issues [1]:
* @Vaclav could you take a look at: r64877 ?
* r62162 - there are some conflicts, any opinion - backport or not ?
* What is the status of r65057 - not clear, issues are not solved in
trunk. I event think that none of them should be backported. Let's
focus on 7.1 release.
what about r.import/v.import? I would like to have them in 7.0.2. It
wouldn't influence anything. The related changes in the gui would be
for 7.1. Then we could remove them from addons. We don't have to
advertise them too much yet and keep testing, but it would simplify
things to have them in releasebranch.
+1
Moritz
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
