"Import of common formats with reprojection" sounds better to me.
Doug On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 4:42 AM, Markus Neteler <nete...@osgeo.org> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 2:12 AM, Anna Petrášová <kratocha...@gmail.com> > wrote: > ... > > The label should be changed to 'Import common formats' and the name of > tag > > would be ImportCommonRasterFormat and ImportCommonVectorFormat. > > Any native speaker out there? > I'm still not convinced of > "Common formats import with reprojection" > > and would suggest > "Import of common formats with reprojection" > > (even if reprojection not always applies) > > ? > Markus > _______________________________________________ > grass-dev mailing list > grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev > -- Doug Newcomb USFWS Raleigh, NC 919-856-4520 ext. 14 doug_newc...@fws.gov --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The opinions I express are my own and are not representative of the official policy of the U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service or Dept. of the Interior. Life is too short for undocumented, proprietary data formats. As a federal employee, my email may be subject to FOIA request.
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
