On 25/02/16 13:45, Vaclav Petras wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 4:14 AM, Martin Landa <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
2016-02-25 8:59 GMT+01:00 Luca Delucchi <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>:
> I support this, but I think it should be 7.2 not 7.1. Usually stable
> version is even number
>https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/Release
> only 6.3 was an exception
then we should probably rename milestone from 7.1. to 7.2 [1]. Ma
What would be the point in skipping the one version? Or why stable and
unstable versions? How many times we did that? Last time we did that was
10 years back. Is it user-friendly? I don't think so.
I don't understand this no odd numbers versioning. Please explain.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_versioning#Odd-numbered_versions_for_development_releases
I don't have a strong opinion either way, as I don't think that this
scheme is so strong in people's heads that they would be surprised by a
7.1, it hasn't really been followed much in GRASS' history.
Moritz
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
