On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Pietro <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Vaclav Petras <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 5:33 AM, Pietro <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I have fixed these errors, but since these changes are not fixing >>> bugs, I've just reverted them. I will commit these change back to >>> trunk as soon as we can start working on grass72. >> >> >> I hope this won't become a common practice. I think trunk is where the >> development happens. It is not a stable branch regardless of any plans. >> Should I also revert all my non-bugfixes from last weeks? If needed, I can >> certainly do that in the 7.2 release branch once thare is one. I just don't >> see need to do this in trunk. > > Perhaps I miss-interpreted what Martin said to me in (Re: [GRASS-SVN] > r68140 - in grass/trunk/scripts: d.correlate...): > > "personally I would wait with such changes to the moment when we will > create releasebranch_7_2 (two months before planning 7.2. release. For > now I would suggest to revert these changes from trunk. Any opinion?" > > no one reply on his question, and therefore I reverted. Perhaps I > should wait longer...
Yes, I think so :-) > What can I say is that it is quite challenging to maintain such large > changes locally on my pc, with not possibility to commit smaller > changes... Indeed... I think that the changes are relevant for 7.2, so that should be in trunk now to receive sufficient testing. We are not in freeze nor anything else at time. > Git+pull request, in this case, seems much more flexible. Maybe, but IMHO this would be a different topic. Markus _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
