Hi, no special reason for not listing the module description too, just did not came to my mind
Just do it [1] J [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXsQAXx_ao0 čt 18. 8. 2016 v 20:32 odesílatel Vaclav Petras <[email protected]> napsal: > Hi Jachym, > > the g.search.module -g flag (shell style output) outputs just names. Do > you have a particular reason for it? My use case is something like that: > > g.search.modules keyword="support" -g | sed -e "s/|[^|]*$//g" | sed -e > "s/|/\t/g" > > with the following desired output (name + keywords, description removed by > sed): > > g.version general,support,citing,copyright,version,license > t.support temporal,metadata,time > r.support raster,metadata > r.support.stats raster,statistics > r.out.gdal raster,export > v.out.ogr vector,export,OGR > r3.support raster3d,metadata,voxel > g.findetc general,map management,scripts > v.external vector,import,external,OGR,PostGIS > g.message general,support,scripts > g.tempfile general,support,scripts > v.support vector,metadata > r.external raster,import,external > > I can actually see that outputting just module names can be advantageous > in some cases. But I want to get something like, so I can throw sed and > grep on it: > > v.support|vector,metadata|Updates vector map metadata. > > If we permit change of the interface, I think -g could do the output > above. This would make the -g output more like the others: same information > as by default and with -j, so we can even consider it fixing a bug. > > The current output with -g can be generated with some other flag. -n* for > "names only" perhaps? > > Best, > Vaclav > > * https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/2016-August/081556.html >
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
