W dniu 05.09.2016 o 10:45, Markus Neteler pisze:
On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Maciej Sieczka <[email protected]> wrote:
W dniu 05.09.2016 o 01:32, Anna Petrášová pisze:

but nothing will change in svn (except for the howto_release.txt), so
can't you just make a new package?

If you asked me - release is meant to be immutable. But please do what
you think is right.

No idea what's right.
The tarball was wrong, the SVN tag is right.

So this is a bit less of an issue then.

What is the best practice for packaging errors? I remember that there
were issues once in a PROJ4 tarball as well. But I don't recall how
they dealt with it.

A new full release of 6 would be a major PITA, with hours of work for
me which I just spent recently on this topic.

Yup, the PITA factor should never be understimated; but easily is from a
distance.

Thanks for the new tarball. It builds fine. Hopefully nobody picked up
the old one for their builds.

Maciek

--
Maciej Sieczka
http://www.sieczka.org

_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

Reply via email to