On Apr 15, 2017 3:05 PM, "Benjamin Ducke" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 15/04/17 14:57, Markus Neteler wrote: ... > > Would it be possible to have larger pics here? I guess they come from > > Benjamin? > > No, the ones I submitted are really tiny.
A pity... > The new LiDAR images are much larger. They > use the "width=" HMTL attribute, so they show > up much smaller on screen than they actually > are. Yes, on purpose. The idea is to have higher resolution images in the code while showing a clickable standard 600px width in the HTML page. With a click one sees the larger image which is then also usable for presentations and such (not possible with 250px only). > Supposedly, the wxPython HTML renderer > does not apply "width=" correctly and does not > resize the image on the fly. Unfortunately... Maybe an extra trick is needed/possible for this limited renderer. I'd like to not give up on quality submissions. > However, > "Submitting/Docs" seems to assume that "width=" > _will_ be processed correctly. So maybe the > best "fix" would be to add a statement to the > Wiki that images should be resized with an > external graphics editor (to 600 pixels width > or less) before including them in HTML man pages. Please don't... See above for the motivation. For a few years we follow the new policy. Better fix/work around the bad wx HTML renderer than reverting to low image quality. Cheers, Markus
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
