On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Moritz Lennert <mlenn...@club.worldonline.be> wrote: > On 26/06/17 15:42, Markus Neteler wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Markus Metz >>> On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 11:39 PM, Markus Neteler <nete...@osgeo.org> >> ... >>> That means, some distros would update GRASS from 7.0.5 to 7.0.6 but not >>> to 7.2.2? Weird. >> >> AFAIK their rationale is to introduce major updates only within a full >> distro release cycle. >> However, I am just guessing here, extrapolating from what I observed >> in Fedora and Debian. > > In Debian, it's mostly a question of timing between Debian freeze for a new > release and our releases. The new stable was released a week ago with > 7.2.0-2, and Debian testing has 7.2.1-1.
FWIW, I got 7.2.1 into Fedora yesterday via maintainer Devrim Gündüz (my updated SPEC file + ctypes patch): https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=1972 :-) Ok, back to the topic: If the majority of grass-devs thinks that a 7.0.6 release is not needed, I'm ok with that. Maintainers just need to understand that the final patch from #3331 is needed to compile with GCC 7. markusN _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev