On 25 July 2017 at 04:01, Vaclav Petras <[email protected]> wrote: > > One of the triangles at the bottom is white (the overall background is > transparent). Is that an intention? >
it seems yes, I just copied the osgeo one.. > A long term endeavor: the whole paragraph shows bold for me. > also in the osgeo one, but I really don't like it, however if others like this I can easily modified this. Do you think all the paragraphs? > Interoperability: I would remove gstat since AFAIU it is retired. There may > be better candidates for that place. For example, we are successfully using > GRASS with Blender (although the heavy lifting is mostly done on the Blender > part thanks to Blender GIS plugin & GDAL). ParaView may be a better > candidate. > ok for gstat, I will add Blender, Paraview is already there with VTK, maybe replace VTK with Paraview? > G Logo: You have there logo without text with GRASS GIS next to it, so it > looks like a logo. We need to be careful with that and keep the brand. I > agree that we need a more horizontal logo and that we can have a logo in > OSGeo colors (as an alternative). I'm attaching Vincent's version with text > but in OSGeo colors (or close to them - there was still some confusion when > I was grabbing those). > I don't see the logo, however with i'm going to add the logo with GRASS GIS text in black and leave also the GRASS GIS text with OSGeo colors > OSGeo logo: It is not there, should be? > I don't think so, because the idea is to fill the OSGeo brochure [0] (there will be some changed also here) with the interested OSGeo projects/initiatives for each people going to OSGeo booth > URL: Does it need to be a full URL with http://? > no, the OSGeo flyer has no, do you prefer grass.osgeo.org only? > Vaclav [0] https://github.com/OSGeo/osgeo/blob/master/marketing/print/brochure_a3.pdf -- ciao Luca www.lucadelu.org _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
