Luca Delucchi wrote > Il 22 feb 2018 7:27 PM, "Helmut Kudrnovsky" <
> hellik@ > > ha scritto: > > If anyone interested > > https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/wiki/DeveloperMeetingMadeira2018# > future-of-processing-providers > > there you can find the info about the discussion meeting regarding Future > of > QGIS processing/external alg providers > > Proposed schedule: 23/02 10:30 - > https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg= > Future+of+Processing+Providers&iso=20180223T1030 > > the meeting can be joined remotely. > > > Hi, I meet Paolo Cavallini in Rome for foss4g and he told me that to > attend > it and spoke about what we could do. I think that grass developer are > already super busy with actual duties, the QGIS one could be to much for > us. > I think we should support them to create a toolboxes using actual grass > tools like the parser output. > > Maybe we could add a flag in future versions of grass for parameters to > exclude in QGIS > > My2cents I agree that we as GRASS dev may be already very/too busy to keep GRASS at its highest level. but I also think the inter-project communication should be kept proactively alive to tackle such challenges... because looking at all these cool tutorials about the OSGeo GIS stack floating around nowadays .... it's a co-success ..... :-) ----- best regards Helmut -- Sent from: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Grass-Dev-f3991897.html _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev