Michael,

we are all aware of this issue and I think that this should be part of the 
discussion 
of how to make the GRASS startup more friendly for newcomers.
Here is a summary of some ideas from the recent discussion on the list and in 
our lab:
https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/wxGUIDevelopment/New_Startup 
<https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/wxGUIDevelopment/New_Startup>

as you can see the proposals refer to a project (it was also called "project 
location"), 
but as we discussed it this week in our lab it can get complicated. CRS may be 
confusing 
to new users as well because there can be many different locations with the 
same CRS for
different projects.

Feel free to add summary of your ideas to the trac linked above,

Helena


> On Jun 1, 2018, at 6:51 PM, Michael Barton <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> As one of the most venerable desktop GIS packages and perhaps THE most 
> venerable still in existence, GRASS has some quirks that harken back to its 
> origins long ago. Most are simply quirky. But the folder hierarchy called a 
> “location” is very confusing in today’s GIS world. Originally, it did 
> primarily refer to maps referencing a geographic location in the world. 
> Although that meaning still exists in the ‘default region’, GRASS locations 
> primarily refer to a coordinate reference system (CRS). In fact, while the 
> CRS of a location cannot be changed (unless you manually alter some of the 
> files in the directory, at the risk of making maps unuseable), the default 
> region can be. So a location now refers to a fixed CRS and a changeable 
> geographic extent.
>  
> Use of the anachronistic term “location” to refer to a CRS is a quirk that 
> makes GRASS more confusing to initial users. I suggest we consider beginning 
> to migrate the term “location” to “CRS”. The term “location” does not occur 
> in a large number of module interfaces: those (like g.mapset) for changing to 
> a new working directory on the fly, vector and raster reprojection modules, 
> and maybe a couple of others. It occurs in the GUI at startup, in the 
> location wizard of course, and in some tools for georeferencing.
>  
> We could initially maintain backward compatibility and increase 
> understandability by simply referring to “location” as something like 
> “location/CRS” where ever it shows up in the GUI, but leave module arguments 
> alone. A next step would be to have modules that require “location=” as an 
> argument accept either “location=” or “CRS=”. And maybe that is enough. We 
> could keep “location” where it currently occurs in existing command modules 
> and scripts as a legacy option. Likewise, we could keep it in current code, 
> only changing during code rewrites. Any new modules that need to refer to 
> this file hierarchy would use “CRS”.
>  
> Thoughts?
>  
> Michael
>  
> ______________________________
> C. Michael Barton 
> Director, Center for Social Dynamics & Complexity
> Professor of Anthropology, School of Human Evolution & Social Change
> Head, Graduate Faculty in Complex Adaptive Systems Science
> Arizona State University
> Tempe, AZ  85287-2402
> USA
>  
> voice:    480-965-6262 (SHESC), 480-965-8130/727-9746 (CSDC)
> fax:          480-965-7671(SHESC), 480-727-0709 (CSDC)
> www:      http://csdc.asu.edu, http://shesc.asu.edu
>                                 http://www.public.asu.edu/~cmbarton
>  
> _______________________________________________
> grass-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

Helena Mitasova
Professor at the Department of Marine, 
Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences
Associate director and faculty fellow at the Center for Geospatial Analytics
North Carolina State University
Raleigh, NC 27695-8208
[email protected]
http://geospatial.ncsu.edu/osgeorel/publications.html 
<http://geospatial.ncsu.edu/osgeorel/publications.html>

"All electronic mail messages in connection with State business which are sent 
to or received by this account are subject to the NC Public Records Law and may 
be disclosed to third parties.” 

_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

Reply via email to