Hei Nikos, No worries. Did not have the time to test, but if your changes make Collection 1 work, why reverting? Happy to see you following up! And if something by accident is not working as expected, let us rather fix your updated version than reverting your commit.
Cheers Stefan -----Original Message----- From: Nikos Alexandris <[email protected]> Sent: lørdag 9. juni 2018 08:00 To: Stefan Blumentrath <[email protected]> Cc: GRASS-GIS development mailing list <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Landsat 8 Collection-1 QA bits Stefan, svn committers, in syncing the i.landsat8.swlst module, I just unintentionally committed local changes I had for `i.landsat8.qc`. I am sorry for that. What is the best way to revert only this module in this case? Thank you, Nikos * Nikos Alexandris <[email protected]> [2018-06-05 12:07:52 +0200]: >Stefan: > >>Hi Nikos, >> >>Thanks for the heads-up and updates on this matter. >> >>Since GUI cannot be changed dynamically based on selected options, I >>guess removing Pre-collection QA bits altogether is the most sensible >>solution? Alternatively, the module could be split into two: one for >>Pre-collection and one collection-1 version... > >This option, here https://gitlab.com/NikosAlexandris/i.landsat8.qa. Let >me know what you think (sorry for rewording names and comments). > >Manual not updated. > >Nikos > >> >>If Pre-Collection products are removed, it might be more convenient to >>change the rules to the new collection products? >> >>Feel free to implement changes you prefer... >> >>Cheers Stefan -- Nikos Alexandris | Remote Sensing & Geomatics GPG Key Fingerprint 6F9D4506F3CA28380974D31A9053534B693C4FB3 _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
