On 28/10/19 12:33, Markus Neteler wrote:
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 10:46 AM Moritz Lennert
<mlenn...@club.worldonline.be> wrote:
On 27/10/19 18:52, Markus Neteler wrote:
Hi,

I am using i.fusion.hpf on Worldview-2 data and see that the resulting
range is completely different:

# orig
r.info -r wv2_17OCT08182034_M2AS_058891334010_01_P001.5
min=0
max=1509

# HPF
r.info -r wv2_17OCT08182034_M2AS_058891334010_01_P001.5.hpf
min=-1045.79783524995
max=3416.06793724612

Just guessing here, but did you try the -c flag ?

Now yes:

i.fusion.hpf pan=$PAN msx=$(g.list raster pattern="$COLORPREFIX.?"
sep=comma) -c --o

# band 8
r.info -r wv2_17OCT08182034_M2AS_058891334010_01_P001.8
min=0
max=1605

r.info -r wv2_17OCT08182034_M2AS_058891334010_01_P001.8.hpf
min=-1163.98434592277
max=3879.99538075697

So, -c doesn't seem to have any effect here.


Sorry, wrong flag, should have been -l ("Linearly match histogram of Pan-sharpened output to Multi-Spectral input")

And if you rescale the output manually to the input value range, do you still see a good fusion result ? If yes, then this could be added as a last step to the module.

Moritz
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

Reply via email to