On Fri, 1 Jun 2012, Markus Neteler wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Markus Neteler <[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Hamish <[email protected]> wrote:
Markus wrote:
I motion to grant write access already now since Vaclav has
^^^^^^- call for vote
...
fwiw, even if non-controversial, granting access requires us to record
a formal vote,
RFC1:
"The following issue(s) <b>must</b> have a vote called before a
decision is reached:
- Granting source code repository write access for new developers
...
"
Sure.
See my other mail for non-active members, so I believe that
a quorum is sufficient.
Current state:
Michael Barton: support
Dylan Beaudette: ?
Hamish Bowman: support
Massimiliano Cannata: support
Brad Douglas: ?
Paul Kelly: ?
Helena Mitasova: support
Scott Mitchell: ?
Markus Neteler: support
Maciej Sieczka: ?
I hope we can collect more vote soon.
Based on the recommendations by Markus, Martin and Anne, my vote for
Vaclav being granted write access is +0 (mild support).
FWIW, I normally abstain from these votes as I don't think a +1 (support
for the proposal and willingness to support implementation) is technically
the correct vote to give, when I won't be directly involved in any way in
integrating the new committer into the GRASS development team, e.g. by
setting write permissions on the SVN server or peer reviewing code
submissions for the new person being granted access.
But I don't want my +0 vote to be seen as in any way indicating lack of
support for adding the new contributor when everyone else is liberally
dispensing +1s! Hence my usual abstention, to avoid my pedantry
accidentally offending anyone ;)
Paul
_______________________________________________
grass-psc mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
