On 19/05/14 05:30, GRASS GIS wrote:
And again, even if this were a valid candidate for G6, backporting stuff
directly to 6.4 without going into devbr6 for at least light/any testing
first, especially anything which touches core libgis, especially a time
right before RC release, is incredibly risky for anything which is not a
critical bug fix, and not an environment I can justify contributing my
time to.
sorry if I'm grumpy, but I'm at the end of my rope about this.
regards,
Hamish
How about my proposal from a few weeks ago: Nobody commits to
grass64release, only to grass6dev, and Hamish is the official maintainer
of grass64release and decides what can be backported ?
This obviously can only work if Hamish has the time, so that 6.4.4 is
not stalled for lack of manpower.
Moritz
_______________________________________________
grass-psc mailing list
grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
