Martin wrote: >> I agree, if no objection I will remove `rfc` directory from SVN in the >> next days. Martin > > done in all active branches.
Hi, Voted-on RFCs are completed published documents and never changed, only superseded/replaced by a new RFC. Only in-draft RFCs should be held in a wiki, and even then edits should be restricted to only the core commit group (which is why we put them in svn). In addition svn has stronger and more robust changelog history and wider backup-copy dissemination, which for legal foundation documents ensures the copy you are looking at is verifiable all over the world as the version that the PSC voted on. If the only copy is on the wiki server you're at the whim of anyone who manages to get write access to the backend DB. Completed RFCs do not belong in a wiki. For bomb-proof full changelog disclosure, draft revisions probably belong in the main SVN too. regards, Hamish _______________________________________________ grass-psc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
