On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 11:25 PM, Anna Petrášová <kratocha...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Martin Landa <landa.mar...@gmail.com> ... >> I understand the point, on the other hand it's extra work for release >> manager and packager which would sometimes make sense to avoid and be >> so not strict in the way that RC2 step could be optional (or skipped >> if no objection from community). On the other hand we can add more >> steps (RC3, RC4, ...) if it will be necessary in the case of extra >> complicated release. >> >> Any comments, ideas? Thanks, Martin > > > I agree with Martin, I guess it's quite a bit of work involved in it and it > seems we now started to release more often than in previous years, which is > a good trend. So I would rather release more often with less RCs.
I agree on this since each RC takes hours of work (check, package, upload, write and email announcements, updated many CMS Web pages, chase packagers etc etc). Markus _______________________________________________ grass-psc mailing list grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
