On 15 February 2016 at 16:21, Vaclav Petras <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I did it this way on purpose. The development cycle, code quality and code > importance are different. Even the pool of developers is little bit > different. Code stats for addons tell you nothing about the core GRASS > moving forward or not. Also if we decide that the addon is a good > contribution to main GRASS, we move it (e.g. i.segment) which will show the > code in the main stats. So, these are my reasons behind separate stats. >
+1 (please remenber to use "svn cp" when move addons to main GRASS code) -- ciao Luca http://gis.cri.fmach.it/delucchi/ www.lucadelu.org _______________________________________________ grass-psc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
