On 15/06/17 10:54, Markus Neteler wrote:
HI PSC,
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Markus Neteler <[email protected]> wrote:
PSC,
we didn't invite new core developers for a while, I think this should
be done asap.
Again a somewhat sensitive topic, how shall we proceed? I have some
ideas but did not approach those people yet.
Open discussion without names :-)
ok.. given the "wild" discussion, perhaps a different procedure is desired?
I don't really think so. I think we should make this much more concrete.
Does anyone have someone they want to propose as core developer ?
Personally, I think that this should just happen naturally, with
possibly a more proactive call (like yours) once in a while.
Do you have anyone specific in mind ? Who are the people who have
contributed much in the form of addons ?
I think that anyone who has a candidate should just propose to the PSC, or ?
Like:
- propose and go for voting? Note that according to RFC1 [1] + the
HwoToContribute [2] we need to vote for a new core developer;
- migrate to git and no more need to use this procedure?
That will probably still take some time, so I think that if there are
candidates we should invite them now.
But as you say, git might help incite more people to "just" contribute...
Moritz
_______________________________________________
grass-psc mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
