On 12/12/19 10:51, Martin Landa wrote:
Hi Moritz,
čt 12. 12. 2019 v 10:13 odesílatel Moritz Lennert
<[email protected]> napsal:
- IIUC, most of the budget you are asking for is actually for
promotional material (stickers, magnets) that are only indirectly linked
to the code sprint, or ? I would therefore suggest to separate the two
make sense to me. In reality you are suggesting two separated voting
procedures, right?
Well, don't know if we really need two voting procedures, or just one
vote combining the two expenses...
requests to make that more apparent. Your actual "sprinting" costs are
<60€, or ?
Yes, only one dinner, two lunches + small food.
No beer ??? ;-)
- In the report, you write: "We spent several hours over the course of
the sprint discussing different alternatives and finding a best way to
implement the one we have chosen." I see that everything has been
documented in detail on the relevant wiki page:
https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/wxGUIDevelopment/New_Startup#GRASSGISCommunitySprintPrague2019,
but would it be possible summarize the general philosophy on the mailing
list ? I think this is an important part of GRASS GIS and discussion
should be larger.
Sure, on the other hand we cannot discuss it forever :-) We have
prepared step-by-step roadmap, see [1]. No big revolution, just small
but important steps. Feel free to comment!
Yes, I saw that (that's why I already included the same link ;-) ), but
it is very detailed and so I'm not sure I really understand the big
picture of the general philosophy you have decided. On the wiki page we
started out by discussing two general options: "Keep current paradigm,
but make contact easier" or "Change paradigm" (e.g. "Open into a
predefined lat-long location but give information message"). IIUC, your
roadmap follows the first option, or ?
There's just too many trees for me to see the forest ;-)
Moritz
_______________________________________________
grass-psc mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
