On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 1:29 PM Nicklas Larsson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Moritz, > > I'd be honoured! > I will put it on GRASS Wiki [1] if you don't have another suggestion and notify here when done. > Thanks a lot Nicklas for raising this discussion!
I am sure GRASS will benefit if we allow new C standard features, e.g. handling of integer types, math constants, nan, inf, etc, which will also improve portability. Markus M > Best, > Nicklas > > > [1] https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/RFC > > > > On Thursday, 11 February 2021, 12:54:30 CET, Moritz Lennert < [email protected]> wrote: > > > On 10/02/21 13:16, Nicklas Larsson wrote: > > It would be most favourable for all contributors and the project if the > > community could come to an agreement on this topic. I see no reason to > > postpone a decision on this much longer. > > > > The final word on this need to be that of the PSC's. Whether through > > simple vote or a RFC. However, a sounding of the opinion of the > > dev-community on this matter is of equal importance and can be of help > > for the PSC. > > Thanks a lot, Nicklas, for this very comprehensive summary ! > > A suggestion made at the first meeting of the new PSC was to use this > discussion as a use case for a more extensive usage of RFC's to put > important decisions into more permanent documents than mailing list > archives and to provoke a formal decision as you suggest. Would you be > willing to write a first draft of such an RFC ? > > > Moritz
_______________________________________________ grass-psc mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
