On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Jarek Jasiewicz wrote:
Hi all!
first of all - all works and results are as I expeted.
I rather like to consult your opinion about method I used to implement LOESS
(Local Polynomial Regression Fitting) to analize spatial data in R
I prepared testing population of random point and sampled spGridDataFrame
(with overlay from sp package), next tried to fit local polinominal to points
and predict it on grid
I tried it on the spPointDataFrame:
ls=loess(height~coords,data=points,span=0.3), and of course it faliled
Inserting coordinates(points) does work, but generates unhelpful internal
variable names (see str(ls)) and look for xnames).
Next step was with to repit it with ordinary data frame:
data.frame(points)
ls=loess(height~(x+y), span=0.3)
and predicted it on oridnary data frame:
grid=data.fame(sp_grid)
names(grid)=c("f","x","y")
result=predict(ls,grid)
and I've substituted: (result is numeric vector)
sp_grid$f=result
all is OK, values are as can expected and spatially corected
So I have three question:
-first: Is there any information about using R fo fit LOESS to spatial data
(I didn't found nothing abot it)
There may be some general information somewhere - this local regression
may end up like using s(x,y) in gam() from mgcv, that is a non-parametric
localised smooth.
-second is posible and how process this with spatialgrid and spatial points
datasets (I suppose it will be faster)
You'd need to write wrappers and it wouldn't be faster. The mechanism is
that model fitting functions construct names of formula (and other
argument) variables and store them in the object. The predict method then
simply looks for the same names in the newdata object - if newdata$x
exists, it will be used as new data for x
-3th: is the procedure proper?
Like most non- and semi-parametric methods, that depends on your
definition of proper. In mgcv, gam() uses cross-validation to choose the
smoothing parameters. You might do something similar to choose the span=
argument. If you have traning and testing data sets, you can see how well
loess predicts the test data given the training data.
Hope this helps,
Roger
regards
Jarek
_______________________________________________
grass-stats mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-stats
--
Roger Bivand
Economic Geography Section, Department of Economics, Norwegian School of
Economics and Business Administration, Helleveien 30, N-5045 Bergen,
Norway. voice: +47 55 95 93 55; fax +47 55 95 95 43
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
grass-stats mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-stats
