> Roger: > Speed is a secondary issue - primary is just having things work, > and handling the myriad variants of GRASS on different platforms > is hard enough.
very true, and shapefile+DBF is probably (after the native vector format)
the second best tested. But at the same time shapefiles/DBF is a somewhat
lossy format and so no panacea.
regards,
Hamish
_______________________________________________
grass-stats mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-stats
