But the no data on the dem was treated by grass as nodata (when using d.what.rast). Why mask out what is already nodata?
On Jan 8, 2008 1:35 PM, Markus Neteler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 7, 2008 7:40 PM, Daniel Victoria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > After a couple of days I got a successful output from r.watershed. > > Well, almost successful. Some basins looks very weird, as you can see > > in the attached file. Is it because I did not mask out the null cells > > on the dem map (white area on dem30.jpg)? > > Right. No data needs to be no data... > > Markus > _______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
