On Thursday 24 January 2008, Brad Douglas wrote: > On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 14:58 -0800, Dylan Beaudette wrote: > > On Thursday 24 January 2008, Markus Neteler wrote: > > > On Jan 24, 2008 7:25 PM, Dylan Beaudette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Thursday 24 January 2008, Markus Neteler wrote: > > > > > I have added m.eigensystem to GRASS Addons SVN with a slightly > > > > > updated Makefile. Grab here: > > > > > http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass-addons/m.eigensystem > > > > > > > > > > or from SVN > > > > > http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/DownloadSource > > > > > -> Subversion GRASS Addons source code repository > > > > > > > > > > Markus > > > > > > > > Nice. Is this scheduled to be included as a standard module, or is > > > > that pending some user tests? > > > > > > I could still reproduce the manual page examples :) > > > > > > The question is if we want to introduce Fortran code again in the > > > main repository. > > > > > > Markus > > > > Good that the examples still work. Is there a general feeling toward > > _not_ introducing Fortran code back into the dev branch? > > +1. More trouble that it's worth. Please add C port to the TODO list.
Hmm.. While I agree in principle that having code from more than 1 lang can be a pain to manage, I do like the approach used in R where numerous langs are supported. Since I cannot do the re-write, and the functionality seems worth the effort I would vote 0 . Getting someone familiar with what the Fortran code is actually doing would be important if we considered re-writing it... Dylan -- Dylan Beaudette Soil Resource Laboratory http://casoilresource.lawr.ucdavis.edu/ University of California at Davis 530.754.7341 _______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user