Eric, sure not to do with the problem I had:
http://www.nabble.com/MASK-does-not-do-it%27s-work-%28-% 29-with-r.mapcalc-td14407246.html#a14407246 Greets. On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 10:20 -0500, Patton, Eric wrote: > Hi, > > I'm having problems getting a MASK to actually mask anything. > > $ r.mask in=Diff_Nov2007_Oct2007_1m > MASK created. All subsequent raster operations > will be limited to MASK area > Removing or renaming raster file named MASK will > restore raster operations to normal > [Raster MASK present] > > Yet all refreshes of the gis.m map display window do not clip the display > extents > based on the new mask(see attached png). In the screenshot, the mask is the > pink raster, > and underneath it is another raster in my mapset. Shouldn't the underlying > raster's display > be clipped to that of the mask? > > Using r.mapcalc while the mask exists also doesn't seem to obey the extents > of the mask, i.e.: > > r.mapcalc test = 'Diff_Oct2007_Mar2007_1m' > > This creates the raster 'test' with data extents that match > Diff_Oct2007_Mar2007_1m, not the mask's > boundaries. > > I'm using svn-trunk compiled from today's source. > > ~ Eric. > > > _______________________________________________ > grass-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user -- Nikos Alexandris . Department of Remote Sensing & Landscape Information Systems Faculty of Forestry & Environmental Sciences, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg . Tel. +49 (0) 761 203 3697 / Fax. +49 (0) 761 203 3701 / Skype: Nikos.Alexandris . Address: Tennenbacher str. 4, D-79106 Freiburg i. Br., Germany
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
