Edzer:
> With Markus' help I got access, and corrected/extended quite a few things,
> including why R sometimes doesn't print loadings (when they're close to
> 0).

Great!


> I do worry about the wiki that states results are "similar" between R and
> grass, when the differences appear e.g. in the third or second digit of a
> loading (eigenvector value). Clearly something is is going on, here.

So you think it's really important? Isn't it a matter of pixel-inclusion
in the various algorithms/programs?

Nikos

_______________________________________________
grass-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user

Reply via email to