On 16/04/09 18:57, Adam Dershowitz, Ph.D., P.E. wrote:
On Apr 16, 2009, at 3:02 AM, Moritz Lennert wrote:
On 16/04/09 06:29, Adam Dershowitz, Ph.D., P.E. wrote:
I really liked the suggestion, so I tried it....but it doesn't work.
To continue my simple example, I did create view less2 cat,Value
from data where Value < 2; So I end up with a view, as expected. The
problem is that if I now link my map to that view, I get an error: No
attribute found for cat 1 (since the object still tries to link to
1). And, the same for 2 and 4. And, I still see the points and
slashes (ie it still draws point a and puts a null value then a slash
then 1.1. So is there a way to have it not draw a symbol and not draw
"null text" when it can't find an attribute? Since, the whole point
of what I am trying to do in this case is to eliminate certain data
with a query?
What do you mean by "eliminate" ?
Maybe you should be more precise about your objectives. Are you trying
to display something on a map, or not ? If all your looking for is
tables, than you don't need GRASS at all.
Hmmm, I guess I was not that clear. Sorry, and thanks for your help and
patients.
What I mean is that I have a map that has a bunch of sites on it, and
values shown next to each site as a label. In many cases there are
multiple values shown.
What I want to do is draw a second map, where I only show sites where
the value is greater then a certain threshold. In other words, my first
map has all values shown. My second map should just show sites where
value is, for example, greater than 2.0 (or whatever).
So what I ended up doing was copying my original map, and then linking
my new map to a view of the original data. But that didn't work because
then all the sites that are below the threshold (and therefor are not in
the view) don't have a correct value or cat, but the icons are still
shown, and when there were multiple values in the original a slash is
still drawn, since it seems that it is using a "null" value for the labels.
On 16/04/09 07:35, Adam Dershowitz, Ph.D., P.E. wrote:
> It seems like I should be able to edit the cats, and I tried a few
different things with v.edit, but I have not had any luck. I tried
some things like this: v.edit map=foo tool=catdel -r where="cat > 0"
but it gives me: ERROR: Tool catdel requires option cats Although the
above seems to work with tool=select, which I was using to test
things about before doing the delete.
As the message says, tool catdel does not work with a select, but you
have to give it a list of cats. You can do that with something like this:
v.edit map=foo tool=catdel cats=`v.db.select -c foo col=cat where=XYZ
| awk '{printf"%i,",$1} END{print}'`
(note the back ticks)
I ended up doing something pretty similar to this last night, although I
ended up using environmental variables to store the select results. And
it accomplished half of what I need. The problem is that all sites are
still shown, even if they no no longer have any values, in the cases
where the edit has eliminated all of them. So if a vector point had a
value of 1.0, it is still drawn.
If I follow the above with:
v.edit map=foo tool=delete -r where="cat > 0" then it also eliminates
the sites that no longer have any categories. So I guess I have things
working, but it feels like a kluge, and there should be a cleaner solution.
I copied my original vectors, and created the view. Now what I want
to do is to delete all the categories in this vector that point to
null. Is there a way to do that?
Why do you want to do that ? If I understood you correctly, all of
these cats have a meaning. Maybe not in the currently linked view, but
in the original table. So if you delete these cats, you will lose the
link to the values in the original table.
Again, I think we need a better explanation of what it is you are
trying to get at.
Moritz
Here is a bigger picture explanation.
A bunch of samples were taken at different locations and different
times. I want to be able to generate a few different maps:
1) Show all sampling locations (that one is easy and already done).
2) Show all sample locations, and values, where value is > 2.0, for
example. In other words, if the value at a location is below 2.0 then
don't display the value, and if all the values at that location are
below 2.0 don't even display the icon for the location.
Essentially what I am trying to do is to put a red dot where ever the I
had a measurement above 2.0, and also list those values by the red dot.
So far I have not been able to get the above using views and linking to
those views, because GRASS still "knows" about the points that are below
2.0 and tries to display them even if they are not in the view and
treats them as null values, rather then as values to be ignored.
So far the solution that seems to work is:
1) Create my master map showing all locations and values.
2) Make a copy map that I will then edit.
3) In my copy map use what you had above, v.edit tool=catdel etc., to
delete the categories that don't meet a query.
4) Delete any points from my copy that now don't have any cat remaining
using v.edit map=foo tool=delete -r where="cat > 0"
So, I think that the above does accomplish what I need. But it was
pretty round-about to get it figured out and working. I figured that
there would be an easier way to do a query and just show sites and
values that are returned by the query.
I think your only other way around this problem is to use Vincent's
suggestion of one master map with only one category value per point and
your data in a table with as many lines per id (or per cat) as you want.
Then you create views summarising the information by cat, making sure
that in these view you only have one line per cat, then you link that
view to your map.
Moritz
_______________________________________________
grass-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
