On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 15:01 +0200, Nikos Alexandris wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Roger André <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > My PATH while in GRASS already contains the scripts dir: > > > > > > GRASS 6.4.0RC4 (colombia):~ > echo $PATH > > > > /usr/local/grass-6.4.0RC4/bin:/usr/local/grass-6.4.0RC4/scripts:<snip> > > > > Mine too (the grass-6.4.0svn version). > > > > > > > > What I did find is that each script is under a directory by the same > > > > name in the scripts dir. So for example, d.redraw is in: > > > > /usr/local/grass-6.4.0RC4/scripts/d.redraw/d.redraw > > > > On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 11:44 +0200, Markus Neteler wrote: > > > Wow. This is not desired of course. I am a bit surprised. > > On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 12:18 +0200, Nikos Alexandris wrote: > > [Replying to myself] > > > Maybe I don't get that right but I have grass64_release, grass640_0rc5, > > grass6_devel, grass_trunk. In all of them the scripts (sub-)directory > > contains a directory for each script. In each script-directory there are > > description (html) files and also README, Makefiles, etc. > > > > Isn't this ok? > > Yes it is (for the source code :-). Under /usr/local/grass... (the > installed stuff; currently I use the 64 version) all scripts are bare > files under the scripts directory. > > > > > > I'm going through all of these now, and removing the dir and leaving > > > > the script. Somewhat tedious, but the scripts appear to work. > > > > > Would you mind to check if this is still valid for RC5?
I've installed grass-6.4.0RC5 and there is no problem. Scripts (all of them I suppose seem to) work fine ~ I 've tested several. Nikos _______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
