Hi Michael,

If you create a link to the binary inside the OS X gpsbabel application, you 
should be ok. You can do this, assuming you have the latest gpsbabel binary 
install in your Applications folder, with this command from the Terminal:

sudo ln -s /Applications/GPSBabelFE.app/Contents/MacOS/gpsbabel 
/usr/local/bin/gpsbabel

Alternatively, you can add the path to your Bash profile.

Hope that helps,
John

On Jul 12, 2010, at 4:26 PM, Michael Barton wrote:

> FWIW, I've been teaching a workshop on basic GPS + GIS for archaeology in 
> China, using QGIS. 
> 
> For the Mac at least, the QGIS GPS tools don't work--or don't work correctly. 
> I've got the latest and greatest GPSBabel and QGIS 1.4. The QGIS GPS plugin 
> cannot find GPSBabel. It seems this is because it is assuming that it is set 
> up like on Linux instead of like on the Mac.
> 
> Michael
> ____________________
> C. Michael Barton
> Director, Center for Social Dynamics & Complexity
> Professor of Anthropology, School of Human Evolution & Social Change
> Arizona State University
> 
> Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 16:20:22 +0300
> From: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [GRASS-user] EPSG code for KML
> To: "Bulent Arikan" <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Message-ID:
>        <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=windows-1255
> 
>> On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Hamish <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Bulent wrote:
>>>> I occasionally use Google Earth ?GE? (kml files) and I am aware of the
>>>> fact that there is a bit of distortion (i.e., metric offset) between
>>> GE
>>>> and other projections for a variety of reasons. I am wondering if
>>> anyone
>>>> knows whether there is an EPSG code for KML format so that I can
>>> create
>>>> a LOCATION in Grass using this code and avoid/minimize such
>>> distortions
>>>> when I import vector files.
>>> 
>>> It is fundamentally broken, do not use it for serious GIS work. It is
>>> only valid for visual use and saving cpu cycles on large deployments.
>>> (which is both acceptable and very important for folks like google)
>>> 
>>> (epsg initially refused to include it but finally caved to mass user
>>> pressure)
>>> 
>>> but if you do want to use it, it's just the mercator projection with
>>> a spherical ellipsoid using the WGS84's ellipsoid's major Earth radius
>>> as the only sphere radius. quite simple to define.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Hamish
>>> -----------
>>> 
>> 
>> I was wondering about this. I read several online articles about the
>> problems and the doubts that EPSG has. Unfortunately, I was planning to
>> use
>> this for my archaeological work, which requires accuracy such as locating
>> the trenches and the features, like walls. My issue is, when I need to
>> show
>> polygons (e.g., a rectangle representing a trench), I transfer my GPS
>> points
>> (the readings at 4 corners) to GE and create a polygon there, save it as
>> KML. Then, I open this in QGIS, make a shape file there and import it into
>> GRASS. I suspect there is some distortion and this is a far too
>> complicated
>> routine but I do not know a more practical way.
> 
> I'm curious: Did you try the GPS Tools plugin in QGIS?
> You can simply import the waypoints. They will be in Lon/Lat WGS84,
> avoiding any of the problems with GE projections. THen, in QGIS make your
> polygons, and when you save as shapefile, choose any CRS you want for
> re-projection. Thus your original GPS points, and the polygons will always
> be in Lon/Lat geographic CRS. And for mapping/measuring you can choose any
> appropriate CRS.
> 
> 
>> 
>> ' v.in.gpsbabel ' works fine for retrieving points and tracks from my
>> device. Alternatively, I may digitize the points to create polygons after
>> they are imported in GRASS. I still have to try ' v.in.ascii '
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> B&#65533;ENT
>> 
>> This mail was received via Mail-SeCure System.
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> grass-user mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
>> 
>> This mail was received via Mail-SeCure System.
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> grass-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
> 
> 
> End of grass-user Digest, Vol 51, Issue 25
> ******************************************
> _______________________________________________
> grass-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user

_______________________________________________
grass-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user

Reply via email to