stephen sefick wrote: > Is the r.watershed in 6.4 the one described in the Metz et al. 2010 > paper?
Yes, at least in 6.4.as in svn, not in rc6. > Should I stay with 6.4 or switch to 7. Stay with 6.4, but use an up-to-date version. The 7 version differs only insofar as there is this -b option for all in memory mode and the disk swap mode is much faster than in 6.4 or 6.5. Markus M _______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
