Monica Buescu wrote:
> I'm using r.series with variance option and I'm getting values that are not
> according to var function in MATLAB or var function in EXCEL.
>
> For average and count the result is exacly the expected but for variance
> (e.g. bellow is for a pixel
> [ 73 116 72 81 75 136 101 112 94 67 ]
>
> I get 532.011 in EXCEL and in MATLAB
> and in GRASS i get 478.81
>
> What is happening? Was this already reported?
sum((x - mean)^2 / n) = 478.81
sum((x - mean)^2 / (n-1)) = 532.011
r.series returns the actual (population) variance. The figure you're
looking for is the sample variance, which provides an estimation of
the population variance from a sample of the population.
You can calcualate the sample variance using e.g.:
r.series input=... output=out.pvar,out.count method=variance,count
r.mapcalc "out.svar = out.pvar * out.count / (out.count - 1)"
As you're not the first person to have asked this, we might want to
add alternate versions of the variance and stddev methods (and
possibly skewness and kurtosis).
--
Glynn Clements <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
grass-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user