Hermann wrote: > Where I would see (perhaps) a small deficit in the > communication or documentation is a simple overview about which > (raster) modules respect the current region and resolution, and > which don't. The issue went over the list [1], but as far as I > can see: the documentation did not change [2]. ... > [1] > http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-user/2010-September/057988.html > > [2] > http://grass.osgeo.org/grass64/manuals/html64_user/g.region.html
the text probably belongs in here: http://grass.osgeo.org/grass64/manuals/html64_user/rasterintro.html thanks, Hamish _______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
