See? I knew there was a much better way :)
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Michael Barton <[email protected]>wrote: > Use r.report. > > This will do exactly what you want and output to a file too. > > Michael > ____________________ > C. Michael Barton > Director, Center for Social Dynamics & Complexity > Professor of Anthropology, School of Human Evolution & Social Change > Arizona State University > > voice: 480-965-6262 (SHESC), 480-727-9746 (CSDC) > fax: 480-965-7671 (SHESC), 480-727-0709 (CSDC) > www: http://www.public.asu.edu/~cmbarton, http://csdc.asu.edu > > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 16, 2011, at 2:58 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:36:12 +0000 > > From: Helena Herrera <[email protected]> > > Subject: [GRASS-user] Alternative to r.stats to generate % of surface > > To: [email protected] > > Message-ID: > > <CACCE9tiQOu_A2Xt82ZdTLwM28eMX8ze= > [email protected]> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > > > Greetings > > > > I want to calculte % of surface in a raster map for each Integer class > > value. The thing is that I'm, using r.stats but the sum % values is > always > > much more (104 or 102 or 105). Is there any other (more precised) method > to > > calculate this ? > > THanks > > Helena > > _______________________________________________ > grass-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user >
_______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
