Hi, 2012/1/15 Hamish <[email protected]>: > Martin wrote: >> after some investigation, it's seems to me that WINGISBASE >> has sense in G6, see [1]. I am not sure about >> consequence when we eliminate this variable (?) > > may I suggest to leave the (redundant?) variable > in there for 6.4.2 and set a new task ticket to see > if it can be eliminated for 6.4.3?
agreed, I will eliminate WINGISBASE in devbr6 for testing. Martin -- Martin Landa <landa.martin gmail.com> * http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa _______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
