Il 26/01/2012 20:53, Markus Metz ha scritto: > You would need to provide the input, not the output as an example.
https://int.faunalia.it/~paolo/province.zip > Considering the detail of the output and the threshold used, it is no > surprise that not all boundaries were generalized because that would > break topology. If you want to generalize with a threshold of 100000, > I would recommend to first remove all areas with a size up to 100000. This is not the point. The very same input and command work in Linux, leave ungeneralized boundaries in Windows. If you consider that also r.to.vect for lines also behaves differently between the two OSs, I suspect an OS-specific bug here. Any confirmation? Thanks a lot. -- Paolo Cavallini - Faunalia www.faunalia.eu Full contact details at www.faunalia.eu/pc _______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
