Hi,
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:31:10 +0100
> Von: Moritz Lennert <[email protected]>
> An: Johannes Radinger <[email protected]>
> CC: [email protected]
> Betreff: Re: [GRASS-user] v.to.rast, r.to.vect, "stable" transformation
> On 06/02/12 12:46, Johannes Radinger wrote:
> > The r.thin process is an important step (as recommended also in the
> > manual) and should not be skipped at all!
>
> In general, I agree with you, but I'm not sure that v.to.rast +
> r.to.vect would profit of r.thin in the middle, since v.to.rast already
> should provide a thinned line. AFAIU r.thin is useful when you have
> raster lines produced by something else than v.to.rast.
I can only speak from what I've tested so far: I transformed a river vector
(including meanders and confluences etc.) into a raster. And due to the bends
in some cases the river is not a thinned line. Therefore r.thin is necessary in
my case also for a v.to.raster- line.
>
> > Maybe I just see something wrong..anyway i thought about testing the
> > stability in a loop, but I got stucked in the correct map calc
> > operation. What is the correct (boolean) operator to get:
> >
> > 1) NULL + NULL = NULL
> > 2) not NULL + not NULL = NULL
> > 3) not NULL + NULL = 1
> > 4) NULL + not NULL = 1
>
> How about (untested):
>
> if( (isnull(A) && isnull(B)) || (!isnull(A) && !isnull(B)), null(), 1)
Thank you I'll try that, I just thought that there might be a simple operator
(as I am not that familiar with boolean operators).
/Johannes
>
> Moritz
--
NEU: FreePhone 3-fach-Flat mit kostenlosem Smartphone!
Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone/
_______________________________________________
grass-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
