-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 09/03/12 09:05, Hermann Peifer wrote: > On 09/03/2012 00:16, Glynn Clements wrote: >> >> I would expect it to be the other way around. Most raster modules respect >> the current region >> and mask, because it happens automatically. Modules which don't want to use >> the current >> region have to explicitly set the working region (typically based upon an >> input map); >> modules which don't want inputs to be masked have to explicitly disable >> masking. >> > > Just a thought, not sure if it really makes sense: Raster modules that ignore > the current > region and/or mask could issue some sort of warning, in analogy to "[Raster > MASK present]" > which comes up all the time if I have a MASK map somewhere in the visible > mapsets.
I think that's a good idea - something along the lines of: "[region ignored for this command]" and "[MASK ignored for this command]" Rainer > > Hermann - -- Rainer M. Krug, PhD (Conservation Ecology, SUN), MSc (Conservation Biology, UCT), Dipl. Phys. (Germany) Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology Stellenbosch University South Africa Tel : +33 - (0)9 53 10 27 44 Cell: +33 - (0)6 85 62 59 98 Fax : +33 - (0)9 58 10 27 44 Fax (D): +49 - (0)3 21 21 25 22 44 email: [email protected] Skype: RMkrug -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk9ZwawACgkQoYgNqgF2egoTHACbBb6vogFXiJdH8pPUiV7/msop 2/QAn3mkiSltkoradtmuhjxnND7c3lvy =w4PR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
