On Fri, 20 Apr 2012, Markus Metz wrote:

The resolution has been decreased, in this case several of the original
cells fall into one new cell. A reasonably accurate new value can be
obtained by using the average of all cells falling into a new cell. If on
the contrary resolution is changed from e.g. 30 to 10 feet (increased),
r.resamp.interp with bilinear or bicubic resampling would be a good
choice.

Markus.

  Thank you for clarifying. I wasn't thinking about what happens to cells
when the resolution is made more coarse so I did not see the necessity of
running r.resamp.stats. Now I do.

Rich

_______________________________________________
grass-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user

Reply via email to