We eventually figured out about the region settings being key. But it would have made my life much easier to be able to specify a dpi setting. Adobe photoshop/illustrator folks just seem to live by this measure.
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Tom Russo <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 09:14:13PM -0400, we recorded a bogon-computron > collision of the <[email protected]> flavor, containing: > > We need to have a raster eps or pdf that has a dpi of 300. Reading > through > > the old list entries it appears that ps.map had a hard coded limit of > 75 > > dpi. > > Have you tried it? I believe that hard-coded limit was taken out years > ago. > (as I recall, I may even have been the person who complained about it on > this list, as I had a big raster I needed to render on a large-format > printer, > and this hard-coded limit was in the way.) > > In fact, I'm pretty sure that this limitation is long gone. Look at the > documentation for a current version of ps.map, and it'll tell you that > raster > resolution is controlled by the region settings. > > What old list entries were you reading? > > -- > Tom Russo KM5VY SAR502 DM64ux http://www.swcp.com/~russo/ > Tijeras, NM QRPL#1592 K2#398 SOC#236 > http://kevan.org/brain.cgi?DDTNM > "And, isn't sanity really just a one-trick pony anyway? I mean all you get > is > one trick, rational thinking, but when you're good and crazy, oooh, oooh, > oooh, the sky is the limit!" --- The Tick > > -- Gerald Nelson 1612 Ballard St. Silver Spring, MD 20910 217-390-7888 (cell)
_______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
