Markus Neteler: > > Since this questions comes up from time to time, it would be nice to get > > the summary of this comparative discussion into the Wiki... volunteers > > needed.
Nikos: > Already started working it out! If there are no objections, leave it to me. > Please, consider assistance in reviewing it in the end, which is after all > always useful. I have filtered sentence by sentence the discussions, the manuals and the GRASS 4 Image Processing Tutorial. I am (almost) ready scratching a final version of a text explaining (not how i.cluster works -- this is already well documented, though some wording changes might not be bad to improve the existing manual) the differences/similarities between the algorithm behind i.cluster and the ISODATA algorithm. It might be also worthy to summarise the information in a table, instead of a big text -- or in addition(?). However, I don't think that something like "i.cluster vs ISODATA" could be a valid title. i.cluster is a module implementing some (step of an) algorithm. ISODATA is an algorithm per se. Ideas for a/the (wiki-page-)title? - Clustering based on i.cluster - Clustering algorithm in i.cluster - Unsupervised clustering based on i.cluster - Unsupervised clustering via i.cluster Nikos _______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
