2013/2/26 Benjamin Ducke <bendu...@fastmail.fm>: > A "fix" might be to introduce a new GRASS env > variable that can be set to suppress the cleaning > functions. While it would probably be trivial to > implement this, it would also break with GRASS' > basic design and the assumptions that its vector > processing modules make (namely that the input > data is topologically correct).
Yes, I know. But I think that there are some cases, like this, where the overlaps between polygons are part of the information and need to be preserved. And I understand that a situation like this would limit the application of other modules. Maybe I'm totally wrong: I still have so much to study about GRASS! (english too... right?) :D Thanks, Jose _______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
