How about sticking with shell? We wouldn't worry about endless version issues.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Pietro <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Michael Barton <[email protected]> > wrote: > > My understanding is that Python 3 is not backward compatible with Python > 2. > > it is true, but we are not talking to require python3 instead of > python2, we are talking to require python2.6 instead of python2.4, > that it is not backward compatible. > > Changing python2.4 in python2.6 allow us to start preparing the code > to reduce the gap between python2 and python3. Therefore if one day in > the 2016 or later (may be for GRASS8), we decide to switch definitely > to python3 we should be able to switch without too much effort. > > Pietro > _______________________________________________ > grass-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user >
_______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
