Hi Glynn, Unless I missed it, this does not seem to be mentioned explicitly in the r.recode help file. Would it be an idea to add this?
Paulo On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Glynn Clements <gl...@gclements.plus.com>wrote: > > [CC to grass-dev for discussion] > > Pedro Venâncio wrote: > > > Thank you very much for your answer! > > > > My question lies precisely in the need to know if a quantile value > > which falls as the upper limit for one range and the lower limit of > > the next, should belong to the class anterior or posterior. > > > > > > For example, assuming that r.quantile (with -r flag) gives this result: > > > > 2:6:1 > > 6:8:2 > > 8:12:3 > > 12:20:4 > > 20:873:5 > > > > the value 6 should belong to the first class or second? > > r.recode will treat boundary values as belonging to the upper range, > e.g. in the above example, 6.0 will get recoded to 2. > > This behaviour stems from Rast_fpreclass_get_cell_value() in > lib/raster/fpreclass.c, and isn't configurable (i.e. there's no way > that r.recode's behaviour could be modified without modifying the > fpreclass functions). > > -- > Glynn Clements <gl...@gclements.plus.com> > _______________________________________________ > grass-dev mailing list > grass-...@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev >
_______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
