Hi, 2013/12/19 Markus Neteler <[email protected]>:
>>> when playing with SRTM data I found out that `r.fill.nulls`'s RST >>> method usually fails [1] -- compared to `method=cubic` (cubic spline >>> interpolation) [2]. Is it expectable? >>> >>> Wouldn't be better to change default method to 'cubic' (v.surf.spline >>> is quite slow anyway)? >> >> sorry for noise, really no idea? > > Could you put the (reduced) location anywhere to try it out? sure, here it is [1]. Martin [1] http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa/tmp/location-srtm-test.tar.bz2 -- Martin Landa <landa.martin gmail.com> * http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa _______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
