OK, I found a workaround.
with r.mapcalc I identify all values lt 1 and gt 254 and set them to 1 resp. 254. Actually not a nice way but the result is good enough for the moment.

Anyway, I still would be thankfull for an explanation of the phenomenon, moreover a better solution to avoid that behaviour.

best regards

Stefan

Am 21.02.2014 00:26, schrieb Stefan Kiefer:
Hi,
I tried to orthorectify aerial photographs. That worked fine by now, until i got scans wich appear to be darker as before. At least this is the first observation I made. The effect occured with that scans is, that after rectification some of the dark areas become white (or rather null, querying that cells result in -0.722622310236638). Has anyone had similar experiences when rectifying aerial photographs. And hopefully a hint how to avoid this damages. I suspect that the orthorectified images become double precision whereas the imported scans are integer...

best regards

Stefan
_______________________________________________
grass-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user

_______________________________________________
grass-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user

Reply via email to